Share with us how are you using the powerrrr of the force
Moderator: Alain
by Vsk » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:11 pm
Impresive, but that are barrels right? And you have explosion with your barrels . So why don0t combine the two of them and make explode some and thi other recieve the explosion too like a chain explosions.
I think that will show more impreseive to your engine.
-
Vsk
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:13 pm
by Julio Jerez » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:57 pm
what is this?
Are we having an identity Crysis here?
-
Julio Jerez
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 12253
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 2:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
-
by Vsk » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:02 pm
Julio Jerez wrote:what is this?
Are we having an identity Crysis here?
Yes, when I saw it, that was the first I thought.
That why I say about the explosion add.
You bet it add the explosion leadwerks
.
-
Vsk
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:13 pm
by Leadwerks » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:42 pm
Honestly I don't want to add anything into this renderer unless I spend a lot of time on it and it is perfect. So I think my particle explosions would pollute the perfection of this scene.
-
Leadwerks
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:54 pm
by Julio Jerez » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:57 pm
my commnet was a joke "crysis" get it "crysis".
I guess the is sound better in spanish. or my broken english is nto enought.
-
Julio Jerez
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 12253
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 2:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
-
by agi_shi » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:12 pm
I get it Julio
The only difference is that the above videos looks 100% realtime, while Crysis physics videos are recorded offline and dubbed
-
agi_shi
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:54 pm
by Leadwerks » Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:11 pm
This had to be recorded slowly because I was saving PNG images out each frame, but I think it would run in realtime on a fast CPU.
-
Leadwerks
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:54 pm
by Vsk » Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:49 pm
Leadwerks wrote:Honestly I don't want to add anything into this renderer unless I spend a lot of time on it and it is perfect. So I think my particle explosions would pollute the perfection of this scene.
But have you tried? I have seen your explosion scenes and don't look bad at all.
So why don't try 1000 barrils more explosion?
-
Vsk
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:13 pm
by Leadwerks » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:52 pm
No, it is a completely different renderer and I have to many things to do right now.
-
Leadwerks
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:54 pm
by Vsk » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:06 pm
Leadwerks wrote:No, it is a completely different renderer and I have to many things to do right now.
Ok, Ok, don't get angry
.
It just that your close to do a similar video like the one from crysis.
I didn' know that was a differente rendering.
-
Vsk
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:13 pm
by Julio Jerez » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:02 pm
Hey leadwerk had you being able to get motithreaded mode going?
-
Julio Jerez
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 12253
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 2:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
-
by Leadwerks » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:07 pm
No, it requires that I write the callbacks in C, and I have too many other things to do.
-
Leadwerks
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:54 pm
by Dave Gravel » Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:37 pm
About the speed:
I think it depending more on the mesh vertices count and the newton step that you use and the way to render your mesh... but it's nothing magical
.
And maybe some contact's can coming deleted depending on the quality simulation that you need.
-
Dave Gravel
-
- Posts: 801
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:31 pm
- Location: Quebec in Canada.
-
by Leadwerks » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:33 pm
The rendering speed is not an issue at all. It is very fast when physics are disabled.
-
Leadwerks
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:54 pm
Return to User Gallery
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest